Year-End Sale is Live! Find Exclusive Prices on the Best Selling Pharma & MedTech Reports.Check Now!

Abstract No : Abstract: #LBA15
Indication : Breast cancer
Intervention : Atezolizumab
Company : Roche
Technology : PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor
Of 651 randomised patients, 45% had PD-L1+ mTNBC, 48% were taxane pretreated, 31% had de novo mTNBC and 27% liver metastases. Adding atezo to PAC did not improve PFS or OS in either the PD-L1+ or ITT populations (Table). PFS results in subgroups were consistent with primary results. PAC exposure was not compromised by the addition of atezo. Grade 5 (2% placebo vs 2% atezo) and grade 3/4 AEs (43% vs 49%) were balanced between arms and the safety profile was consistent with known risks of each study drug.
Atezo + PAC did not improve PFS or OS vs placebo + PAC. No new safety signals were seen. Potential reasons for the contrast with the benefit seen in IMpassion130 (atezo + nab-paclitaxel) need further exploration.
Current standard of care (PD-L1 inh + Abraxane) remains unchallanged as Roche presents disappointing results from the failed trial. Unexpectantly no improvement seen in PFS or OS. Worse mortality though not significant reported. Benefit wasn't seen in any sub-group