The landscape of multiple myeloma treatment has undergone a profound transformation with the advent of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting CD38. Among the notable breakthroughs, two anti-CD38 mAbs, DARZALEX (daratumumab) and SARCLISA (isatuximab-irfc), have been approved for clinical use. These groundbreaking multiple myeloma therapies are a game-changer, offering a fresh and effective approach for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM).

DARZALEX Sets New Standards in Multiple Myeloma Treatment Landscape With its Launch in 2015

DARZALEX (a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38) is approved for multiple myeloma alone and in combination with standard-of-care regimens. DARZALEX was first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in November 2015 for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who had received at least three prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD). The approval of DARZALEX represented a significant advancement in the multiple myeloma treatment landscape, especially for patients who had relapsed or were refractory to previous therapies. Its ability to target CD38-positive cells made it a promising option for newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory patients.

Over time, DARZALEX received subsequent approvals for various stages of multiple myeloma treatment. Notably, around 50% of DARZALEX usage comes from second-line multiple myeloma treatment, highlighting its significant role in supporting patients who require further therapeutic options. In the frontline multiple myeloma clinical trials, DARZALEX has emerged triumphant, surpassing all expectations and solidifying its position as the gold standard of therapy. Its unparalleled effectiveness and exceptional safety profile have exceeded rivals’ predictions and soon positioned DARZALEX to dominate the multiple myeloma treatment market. Supported by the NCCN’s recommendation, this game-changing treatment’s spotlight is shining brightly.

Clinical Studies That Led to DARZALEX Label Expansion

Study Name



Patient Population

Study Results

NCCN Recommendation




Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant

Overall response in DRd arm – 92.9%

CR or better (sCR + CR) − 47.6%

MRD negativity rate -24.2%

NCCN Category 1 primary therapy Recommendation




Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant

PFS – 36.4 months

The overall response in the D-VMP arm was 90.9%

MRD negativity rate − 22.3%

MRD negativity rate in patients with CR or better – 49.7%

NCCN Category 1 primary therapy Recommendation




Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma eligible for ASCT

Overall response

DVTd arm – 92.6%

NCCN Category 2A primary therapy Recommendation




Patients with multiple myeloma who had received at least one prior therapy

PFS-45.0 months

Overall response

DRd arm – 91.3%

Category 1 Recommendation




Multiple myeloma who had received at least one prior therapy

Overall response

DVd arm – 79.3%

Category 1 Recommendation




Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had received at least one to three prior lines of therapy

ORR – 81%



Multiple myeloma who had received a prior PI and an immunomodulatory agent

ORR – 59.2%

Category 1 Recommendation




Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had received at least three prior lines of therapy

ORR – 29.2%

Category 2A Recommendation




Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for transplant

ORR – 88%




Patients who received D-Rd

ORR – 91%




Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had received at least three prior lines of therapy

Overall response


IV Daratumumab
– 37%




Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had received at least one to three prior lines of therapy

ORR – 84%

Category 1 Recommendation





Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior line of therapy with both lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor

ORR – 68.9%

Median PFS -12.4 months

Category 1 Recommendation




Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received at least one prior line of therapy

ORR – 84.8%

Median DoR – not reached

DARZALEX also maintains a dominant position among its competitors in the multiple myeloma treatment market, primarily because many drugs currently under evaluation for multiple myeloma treatment are more likely to complement DARZALEX rather than compete directly against it. Likewise, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) is actively exploring the combination of DARZALEX with TECVAYLI, CARVYKTI, and talquetamab.

Approval Timeline of DARZALEX for Multiple Myeloma in the US

With the D-RVd Quad Regimen, Janssen is Strengthening its Position in The Frontline Patient Segment (Both Transplant-eligible and Ineligible Settings)

Adding DARZALEX to both transplant-ineligible and transplant-eligible regimens has improved patient outcomes. Quadruplets combination for multiple myeloma has shown PFS benefits in clinical trials; hence quad-based regimens are predicted to broaden the frontline multiple myeloma treatment paradigm in coming years. In the Phase III CASSIOPEIA study, DARZALEX with VTd-approved quadruplet treatment has previously shown PFS improvements. Moreover, treatment with DVTd reduced the risk of progression or death by 53% compared to VTd alone. Apart from that, in the Phase III ALCYONE study in the transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, the trial demonstrated an improvement in PFS in the D-VMP arm as compared to the VMP arm, representing a 50% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. After a median follow-up of 40 months, the median PFS was 36.4 months in the D-VMP arm. 

The most anticipated DARZALEX quadruplet regimen (D-RVd) is undergoing evaluation for treating newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in transplant-eligible and ineligible patients. The evaluation of this treatment regimen will continue as part of the registrational, Phase III PERSEUS, and CEPHEUS study. Following the encouraging results from the GRIFFIN study, a Phase III trial (PERSEUS) was initiated for transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients. Unlike GRIFFIN, this trial is designed with the statistical power to demonstrate a significant difference in progression-free survival. In addition to this, in the transplant-ineligible patients, the CEPHEUS study was started, which currently has no results.

The bottom line is that the quadruplets are well-tolerated, and incredibly high and sustained response rates have been observed. The PFS follow-up with the GRIFFIN trial is unprecedented in this setting. Researchers have never seen that kind of PFS benefit (showed a PFS benefit of 87% vs. 70%). Moreover, the high-risk subgroups benefit from quadruplet therapy, including those with 1q abnormalities with a stringent complete response (sCR) rate of 42% in the D-RVd arm vs. 32% in the RVd arm by the end of post-autologous stem cell transplant consolidation.

Below mentioned is the expected launch year for D-RVd in both the frontline setting for patients eligible for transplantation and patients not eligible for transplantation.

Anticipated Launch of D-RVd in the US

Impact on DARZALEX’s Position After Entry of its First Direct Rival SARCLISA

SARCLISA, the second CD38 antibody, has received accelerated approval, started gaining some traction in key markets, and became the first direct rival to Johnson & Johnson’s DARZALEX. It is noteworthy that SARCLISA was Sanofi’s first wholly-owned cancer approval since JEVTANA in 2010. In March 2020, the drug was approved by the US FDA in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of R/R multiple myeloma, and in March 2021, the US FDA approved SARCLISA in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone for the treatment of R/R multiple myeloma.

Clinical Trials That Led to SARCLISA’s Approval as a Therapy for Multiple Myeloma

Trial ID/ Study Name


Patient Segment


Study Results



Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma


PFS – 11.53 months

Overall Response Rate- 60.4%



Relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma


PFS – not reached

Overall Response Rate- 86.6%

Data from the Phase III ICARIA-MM study supported the SARCLISA’s approval. According to the findings, the improvement in PFS represented a 40% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in patients treated with Isa-Pd. Data from the Phase III IKEMA study supported the label expansion of SARCLISA. According to the study, patients with multiple myeloma had a 45% lower risk of mortality or disease progression when SARCLISA was added to Kd. These results were marginally superior to the Phase III Candor study by DARZALEX- Kd. The risk of disease progression or mortality was reduced by 37% because of the addition of DARZALEX to carfilzomib and dexamethasone. 

SARCLISA Also Aims to Capture Transplant-eligible and Ineligible Patients With Isa-RVd

A gripping showdown between the two CD38 antibodies awaits transplant-eligible and non-transplant-eligible patients. The mounting evidence for the efficacy of CD38-RVd combinations emerges from groundbreaking studies in the transplant-eligible group, setting the stage for a battle between these cutting-edge therapies. The patients can look forward to an expanded array of options in the first-line transplant-eligible setting, particularly regarding anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies. A groundbreaking moment came with the GMMG-HD7 study’s positive findings, which unveiled the efficacy of the potential combination of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody Isatuximab with RVd compared to RVd alone.

The GMMG-HD7 study first presented the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody Isatuximab with RVd vs. RVd alone. The design of the GMMG-HD7 study was very similar to the GRIFFIN study. Both studies used an RVd backbone, and in the GMMG-HD7 study, Isatuximab was used instead of daratumumab. One of the key differences is that the GMMG-HD7 study is a Phase III study, so the number of patients was higher. The primary endpoint was looking at the MRD negativity rate. At the recent ASH 2022 meeting, the company presented some findings from the MRD negativity rate. GMMG-HD7 showed higher response rates and deeper responses in the quadruplet arm, with 50% of the quadruplet arm being MRD negative vs. 35% being MRD negative in the RVd-alone arm at the end of induction therapy. The other pivotal trial (IMROZ) also evaluates the Isa-RVd for not transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The expected filing submission for GMMG-HD7 study and IMROZ study is anticipated in 2024.

Below mentioned is the expected launch year for Isa-RVd in both the frontline setting for patients eligible for transplantation and patients not eligible for transplantation.

Anticipated Launch of Isa -RVd in the US

The companies are focusing on entering the frontline setting after witnessing the acceptance of treatments like REVLIMID and VELCADE, and now DARZALEX. Market presence in frontline settings is essential from a business perspective because of the greater patient base and less emerging competition. This ambitious endeavor promises to introduce a fresh wave of competition, potentially reshaping the multiple myeloma treatment landscape and offering new hope for those facing this complex and challenging disease in earlier lines.

Uptake Analysis of DARZALEX and SARCLISA

While Johnson & Johnson’s DARZALEX, Bristol Myers Squibb, and AbbVie’s EMPLICITI debuted in the same month, DARZALEX has so far surpassed EMPLICITI regarding blockbuster status. DARZALEX has revolutionized the treatment landscape of multiple myeloma. DARZALEX is a blockbuster therapy, and its strong uptake is attributed to its outstanding safety and efficacy, in addition to the significant increase in the adoption of the subcutaneous (SC) formulation. J&J holds a convenience advantage with DARZALEX FASPRO, which takes 3–5 min to administer instead of the hours needed for the drug’s intravenous (IV) form. Fortunately, the subcutaneous formulation of daratumumab provides a big convenience for both patients and nurses, and this convenience factor and the low-infusion reaction may replace the IV formulation moving forward. 

Multiple Myeloma infographic

SARCLISA is way behind DARZALEX in terms of market expansion, and DARZALEX has also got an early mover advantage of over 4 years. In addition to this, DARZALEX has already been approved in the transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible settings. SARCLISA could become a blockbuster only after an aggressive label expansion and availability of subcutaneous formulation. Sanofi is also coming up with a subcutaneous formulation of SARCLISA in collaboration with Blackstone Life Sciences to treat multiple myeloma. In addition to that, the filing submission of SARCLISA subcutaneous in 3L R/R multiple myeloma (IRAKLIA) is anticipated in 2025 and beyond. Both DARZALEX and SARCLISA have seen growth since their market launch. DARZALEX, in particular, experienced significant uptake since its approval, generating approximately USD 470 million in revenue in the United States in 2016. DARZALEX generated approximately USD 8 billion in global revenue during the year 2022. The graph below illustrates the revenue of these approved CD38-directed therapies from their respective market introductions. The graph highlights the strong market acceptance and commercial success of DARZALEX.

Sales Analysis of DARZALEX and SARCLISA in the United States

The competition intensifies in the later stages of treatment with the emergence of CART-s and bispecific antibodies. Two CAR-T therapies, ABECMA and CARVYKTI, have been approved for multiple myeloma treatment. CAR-Ts are not expected to pose a significant threat to DARZALEX due to their better efficacy and safety profile and evolving use in earlier lines of setting.


The landscape of multiple myeloma treatment is undergoing significant changes, with the emergence of monoclonal antibodies as a key approach for newly diagnosed patients. DARZALEX holds a dominant position compared to its competitors in the market. Moreover, the potential synergy between DARZALEX and other drugs evaluated for multiple myeloma treatment suggests a collaborative rather than a direct competitive future. As the field continues to advance, DARZALEX remains a strong player, paving the way for improved therapeutic options and outcomes for patients with this challenging disease. Furthermore, DARZALEX has established its supremacy and has solidified its position as a leading treatment option across all lines of multiple myeloma. The comprehensive analysis demonstrates Janssen’s remarkable strength in multiple myeloma treatment. Their portfolio stands out as a dominant force across all classes of molecules, including CAR-T cell therapy, CD38-directed therapies, and bispecific antibodies. This outstanding performance highlights Janssen’s commitment to advancing innovative and effective treatments, ultimately significantly impacting patients’ lives in the battle against multiple myeloma.

Multiple Myeloma Market Outlook